Gentleman Saint: St. Edmund Campion

September 12, 2013

edmundDuring the reformation in England, the Church was fiercely persecuted, and many faithful Catholics gave their lives for the faith. Some were mothers, others were priests, others statesmen. But they were all so convinced that the Catholic faith was true that they chose death rather than renounce it.

I want to make it clear that these courageous men and women did not die for religious freedom, as is the common misunderstanding. They died because they loved Jesus and the Catholic faith he founded more than their own lives. It’s the difference between dying so a Hindu can worship false gods in his temple and dying because you love Christ and his Church and could never betray either of them.

Today, I want to briefly share the life of one of these men, St. Edmund Campion.

Early Life

St. Edmund Campion was born around 1540 to a London Bookseller. At the young age of 15, he earned a scholarship to St. John’s College, Oxford (these teenagers were hardcore).

Immediately, young Edmund distinguished himself as an academic and especially as an orator. He was invited to speak at many important functions, and eventually, before Queen Elizabeth herself. His extraordinary abilities and winsome personality so impressed the Queen that he immediately won her patronage and support. A member of her court later referred to Campion as “one of the diamonds of England.”

It is an understatement to say that Edmund had a bright future ahead of him. He could very easily have risen to the highest political offices in England or left a lasting legacy as an academic. But God had other plans.

Conversion and priesthood

In the course of his studies, Edmund was required to take the oath of royal supremacy, stating that the monarch of England was the supreme head of the newly formed church of England. It was impossible to receive a degree or pursue a scholarly life without taking this oath. He also became a deacon in the Anglican church and shortly thereafter received an important position at his university.


All the while, however, he harbored deep doubts about the nature of the church of England and its recent separation from Rome. He eventually traveled to Dublin, where he renounced Anglicanism and reconciled with the Catholic church.

In 1573, Campion traveled to Rome to study for the priesthood with the Jesuits. After his ordination, he taught at the in university in Prague.

Mission to England

At this time in history, the Jesuits were newly formed, and they were considered the shock troops, so to speak, in challenging the spread of Protestantism. Wherever the Church was in most need, that’s where the Jesuits went.

Inspired by the Jesuit successes in other countries, Pope Gregory XIII decided to send Jesuits to England. Edmund Campion and Robert Persons were chosen for the task. Both of these men knew that their mission would most likely cost them their lives, as Catholic priests were regularly imprisoned, tortured, and killed for their ministry.

Unsurprisingly, the moment Campion landed in England, he was on the run. After being chased out London, he traveled around the English countryside preaching and making many notable converts. While his mission was unquestionably successful, he was constantly being pursued by spies, and he was almost captured on several occasions.

But he didn’t lose heart. Instead, he decided to write a scholarly treatise challenging the most learned protestants in England to debate matters of religion with him. The publication of this treatise caused a huge uproar, and efforts to capture him were intensified.

Capture and death

Execution of St. Edmund Campion
Execution of St. Edmund Campion

On a Sunday morning, while preaching and celebrating mass in the countryside, he was finally betrayed by a spy. He was captured shortly thereafter and taken to London for trial.

During the course of his imprisonment, he was tortured severely and urged by a number of protestant dignitaries to recant his Catholic faith. Of course, he refused. Eventually, he and a number of other captured priests were taken before a court on false charges of sedition and conspiracy to raise an uprising in England.

Ironically, the trial turned into an opportunity for apologetics, with Campion skillfully defending himself and the other priests on trial, destroying the trumped up evidence, and dismantling the arguments the church of England used to justify its separation from the Catholic church.

But despite his efforts, the court still found the priests guilty of sedition and condemned them to death by drawing and quartering (if you don’t know what that is, it’s one of the most cruel forms of execution ever devised). Unfortunately for the jury, the priests weren’t dismayed at all. Instead, they began to chant the great Catholic hymn, the Te Deum.

His last words were:

“As to the treasons which have been laid to my charge, and for which I come here to suffer, I desire you all to bear witness with me that I am thereto altogether innocent…I am a Catholic man and a priest; in that Faith I have lived, and in that Faith do I intend to die. If you esteem my Religion treason, then I am guilty; as for the other treason, I never committed any, God is my judge.”


We live in a time of pandemic religious indifference. The vast majority of men don’t really think religion matters all that much. What you believe is really more of a personal preference, they think, and religion certainly isn’t worth dying for.

But this lukewarm attitude is the complete opposite of our Catholic forebears. These men were made of sterner stuff than most of us are today. To them, being Catholic wasn’t a matter of convenience or personal taste, and they didn’t profess the faith because it was comfortable or easy. They professed the faith even at the cost of their lives because they believed in the core of their being that it was true, and Truth mattered more than anything. Does it matter to us?

Studying the lives of these heroic martyrs should inspire us to passionately love the Faith once delivered to the saints. Let’s be courageous and stand up for what we believe, come what may. St. Edmund Campion, pray for us men!

PS: If you want a great read on the Reformation in England, check out the novel Come Rack! Come Rope! by Robert Hugh Benson.

Sam Guzman


Don’t Miss a Thing

Subscribe to get email notifications of new posts and special offers PLUS a St. Joseph digital poster.



Reader Interactions


  1. Bill Hartley says

    A fascinating read – I learned a lot. Thank you.

    You mention “false charges of sedition and conspiracy to raise an uprising in England.” But, in a church/state environment, especially in England’s milieu at the time, that is exactly what an evangelizing Jesuit was.

    Though, as a Protestant, I do not condone the politics, reasons and logic behind Henry XIII’s defection from the Catholic church. But I also cannot endorse the corruption and lasting stains inflicted on the church by the late Medieval and Renaissance papacy. When you speak of your “Catholic forbears,” do you include them all? Because there is a host of historical characters in Catholicism who were much colder than lukewarm about the most important issues of faith.

    “Truth mattered more than anything.Does it matter to us? Let’s be courageous and stand up for what we believe.” Amen. What I want to stand up for is not Catholics-vs.-Protestants, but classical, orthodox theology. When you turn the corner, and celebrate a man who intentionally tried to pull people from a tradition that is valuable to me, in the name of a different sectarian tradition … well, I needed to say something.

    I love “The Catholic Gentleman,” and look forward to learning more in the future. Thanks again for the post.


  2. Titus says

    “You mention ‘false charges of sedition and conspiracy to raise an uprising in England.’ But, in a church/state environment, especially in England’s milieu at the time, that is exactly what an evangelizing Jesuit was.”

    This is false. Treason is not, and never has been in English (or American) law merely a vague doing of something opposed to state functions. Rather, treason was precisely defined by statute. In particular, treason was defined at the time in question by three statutes, the Treason Act of 1351 (25 Edw. 3 St. 5 ch. 2), the Treason Act of 1554 (1 & 2 Ph & M c 10), and the Treasons Act of 1570 (13 Eliz. ch. 1–2). None of those statutes makes preaching the Catholic faith, being a priest (even a Jesuit), or adhering to the Catholic faith a crime, much less a crime punishable as high treason. There were not thought crimes even under the blood-soaked schismatic Elizabeth I: you could only be prosecuted for treason on the testimony of actual witnesses that you had said or done acts proscribed the statutes (or, under the 1351 Act, if Parliament pronounced the act you were proven to have committed to be an unaccounted for species of treason). I thought there was a statute that criminalized the offering of the Mass, but it may have come later, as I don’t see it in the 1570 statute.

    This is why Henry VIII (the only Henry XIII one sees easy reference to online being thirteenth-century duke of Bavaria) and Elizabeth I had to resort to perjured testimony to convict men like St. Thomas More and St. Edmund, who were wise and knowledgeable enough to avoid treasonous acts as defined in the statutes. Even the profoundly unjust laws of the Tudors had actual contents.

    As for “stains” inflicted by the renaissance and medieval popes, where are they? I see at every turn the cultural detritus left behind by the errors of Protestant revolt, a revolt fueled by the lust and greed of unscrupulous and disingenuous men. The “renaissance papacy” has been nothing but a convenient foil and whipping boy to be abused by people who could never name without assistance any of its occupants or acts.

    • The Catholic Gentleman says

      Vatican II did not reverse 2,000 years of consistent Catholic teaching on salvation outside the Church. It declared no new dogmas and taught no new doctrine. It’s stated purpose was to clarify Catholic teaching for modern man. If it clarified it poorly, and in a way that makes you think Hindus can get to heaven without embracing the Catholic faith, then then ancient Catholic teaching trumps the poor clarification. Make sense?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *